A Short Guide to Writing about Art by Sylvan Barnet
if I had taken this guy's class, or a class using this text book, I would have been informed to drop out. you would never see the bad art cafe in this book as referance.
this book is written in the old style. the formal style. the old school of art critque, the reason most art critique is BORING beyond hell. it was the first book on the subject I bought trying to school myself for the standards of writing art crit. I put it down, and looked for something else
now I glace at it. is there anything of of value for me?
(there's a great picture of Jackson Pollock flinging his paint on an unstretch canvas on the floor, so famously captured by Life Magizine in in 1950)
art critiques are harder to write than book critiques.
I liked:
"he knows all about art, but does he knows what he likes?" a James Thurber cartoon
a n unknown critic from the days of yore wrote about Picasso's, The Young Ladies of Avignon (1907): " the drawing is hasty, the color unpleasant, the compostion is confuse . . . . too much concern for effect . . . . in the figures" but then he manages to humble himself: it was famous for what it opened rather than what it achieved.
ok.
My StumbleUpon Page